From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Watts v. Flory

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Aug 19, 2011
No. CIV S-10-2688 GEB CKD P (E.D. Cal. Aug. 19, 2011)

Opinion

No. CIV S-10-2688 GEB CKD P

08-19-2011

TIMOTHY WATTS, Plaintiff, v. S. FLORY, et al., Defendants.


ORDER

By an order filed January 21, 2011 plaintiff was ordered to pay the $350.00 filing fee required to proceed with this action within twenty-one days. The twenty-one day period has long expired, and it does not appear that plaintiff has paid the appropriate filing fee. On Februar 18, 2011, plaintiff filed a notice stating that he was enclosing a money order for $350.00 (Dkt. No. 12) , but the docket does not reflect that the fee was actually paid. As plaintiff apparently made some attempt to pay the fee, the court will grant an additional fourteen days for plaintiff to submit the required filing of $350.00. Failure to pay the filing fee within that period will result in a recommendation that this action be dismissed.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT plaintiff is granted fourteen days from the date of this order to pay the $350.00 filing fee.

CAROLYN K. DELANEY

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE


Summaries of

Watts v. Flory

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Aug 19, 2011
No. CIV S-10-2688 GEB CKD P (E.D. Cal. Aug. 19, 2011)
Case details for

Watts v. Flory

Case Details

Full title:TIMOTHY WATTS, Plaintiff, v. S. FLORY, et al., Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Aug 19, 2011

Citations

No. CIV S-10-2688 GEB CKD P (E.D. Cal. Aug. 19, 2011)