From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Watts v. Flory

United States District Court, E.D. California
Dec 8, 2010
No. CIV S-10-2688 KJM P (E.D. Cal. Dec. 8, 2010)

Opinion

No. CIV S-10-2688 KJM P.

December 8, 2010


ORDER AND FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS


A recent court order was served on plaintiff's address of record and returned by the postal service. It appears that plaintiff has failed to comply with Local Rule 182(f), which requires that a party appearing in propria persona inform the court of any address change.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court randomly assign a United States District Judge to this action; and

IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed for plaintiff's failure to keep the court apprised of his current address. See Local Rules 182(f) and 110.

These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). Within twenty-one days after being served with these findings and recommendations, plaintiff may file written objections with the court. The document should be captioned "Objections to Magistrate Judge's Findings and Recommendations." Plaintiff is advised that failure to file objections within the specified time may waive the right to appeal the District Court's order. Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991).

DATED: December 7, 2010.


Summaries of

Watts v. Flory

United States District Court, E.D. California
Dec 8, 2010
No. CIV S-10-2688 KJM P (E.D. Cal. Dec. 8, 2010)
Case details for

Watts v. Flory

Case Details

Full title:TIMOTHY WATTS, Plaintiff, v. C/O S. FLORY, et al., Defendants

Court:United States District Court, E.D. California

Date published: Dec 8, 2010

Citations

No. CIV S-10-2688 KJM P (E.D. Cal. Dec. 8, 2010)