From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Watts v. Bergh

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION
Feb 22, 2012
CASE NUMBER: 10-12899 (E.D. Mich. Feb. 22, 2012)

Opinion

CASE NUMBER: 10-12899

02-22-2012

GREGORY WATTS, Petitioner, v. DAVID BERGH, Respondent.


HONORABLE VICTORIA A. ROBERTS

Magistrate Judge Paul J. Komives


ORDER ADOPTING MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S

REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

Before the Court is Petitioner Gregory Watts' Application for Writ of Habeas Corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. The Court referred the matter to Magistrate Judge Paul J. Komives for Report and Recommendation ("R & R") pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B). Petitioner filed objections; respondent did not file a response to the objections.

This Court reviews de novo any part of the magistrate's recommendation on a dispositive motion that is properly objected to. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). After careful review of the entire record, the Court agrees with the Magistrate's conclusions. The Magistrate's thorough Report lays out the facts and procedural history of the case, as well as the relevant case law, and rejects each of Petitioner's claims with a reasoned explanation for so holding.

In addition, Magistrate Komives recommends that the Court deny a certificate of appealability ("COA"). An appeal may not be taken from a final order in a habeas case unless a COA is issued. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1); Fed. R. App. P. 22(b). A COA may issue "only if the applicant has made a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right." 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2). When a district court rejects a habeas claim on the merits, "[t]he petitioner must demonstrate that reasonable jurists would find the district court's assessment of the constitutional claims debatable or wrong." Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000). Petitioner has not shown that reasonable jurists would find the Court's assessment of the constitutional claims debatable or wrong. The Court declines to issue a COA.

Accordingly, for the reasons stated in Magistrate Komives' Report, the Court OVERRULES Petitioner's objections and DENIES his application for a writ of habeas corpus. The Court DENIES Petitioner's request for a COA. Magistrate Komives R & R is incorporated by reference here.

IT IS ORDERED.

____________________________

Victoria A. Roberts

United States District Judge
The undersigned certifies that a copy of this document was served on the attorneys of record and Gregory Watts by electronic means or U.S. Mail on February 22, 2012.

Carol A. Pinegar

Deputy Clerk


Summaries of

Watts v. Bergh

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION
Feb 22, 2012
CASE NUMBER: 10-12899 (E.D. Mich. Feb. 22, 2012)
Case details for

Watts v. Bergh

Case Details

Full title:GREGORY WATTS, Petitioner, v. DAVID BERGH, Respondent.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION

Date published: Feb 22, 2012

Citations

CASE NUMBER: 10-12899 (E.D. Mich. Feb. 22, 2012)