From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Watts v. Andion

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Apr 30, 1979
69 A.D.2d 901 (N.Y. App. Div. 1979)

Opinion

April 30, 1979


In a negligence action to recover damages for personal injuries, plaintiff appeals from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County, dated January 30, 1978, as, upon reargument, adhered to the court's original determination denying his motion for a general preference. Order reversed insofar as appealed from, with $50 costs and disbursements, and, upon reargument, motion for a general preference granted. Where, as here, "the injuries, prima facie established by medical proof, might warrant a recovery in excess of" $10,000, the jurisdictional limitation of the Civil Court of the City of New York, it was an improvident exercise of discretion to deny a general preference (see Coletto v. Keogh, 44 A.D.2d 712). Suozzi, J.P., Lazer, Gulotta, Shapiro and Cohalan, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Watts v. Andion

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Apr 30, 1979
69 A.D.2d 901 (N.Y. App. Div. 1979)
Case details for

Watts v. Andion

Case Details

Full title:WILLIAM WATTS, Appellant, v. RAFAEL ANDION et al., Respondents

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Apr 30, 1979

Citations

69 A.D.2d 901 (N.Y. App. Div. 1979)

Citing Cases

Marrone v. Pathmark Supermarket

The action is to be tried in the Supreme Court. Considering the nature and extent of the injuries claimed to…

D'Alessio v. Arias

The action is to be tried in the Supreme Court. Considering the nature and extent of the injuries claimed to…