From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Watts v. Allstate Indem. Co.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SACRAMENTO DIVISION
Sep 15, 2011
CASE NO.: 2:08-CV-01877-LKK-KJN (E.D. Cal. Sep. 15, 2011)

Opinion

CASE NO.: 2:08-CV-01877-LKK-KJN

09-15-2011

ROBERT WATTS, on behalf of himself individually and all other similarly situated, Plaintiff, v. ALLSTATE INDEMNITY COMPANY, an Illinois corporation, ALLSTATE INSURANCE COMPANY, an Illinois corporation, ALLSTATE PROPERTY AND CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY, an Illinois corporation; and DOES 1 through 100, inclusive, Defendants.

YORK LAW CORPORATION WENDY C. YORK JENNIFER B. EULER Attorneys for Plaintiff ROBERT WATTS SONNENSCHEIN NATH & ROSENTHAL LLP SONIA MARTIN Attorneys for Attorneys for Defendants ALLSTATE INDEMNITY COMPANY, ALLSTATE INSURANCE COMPANY, and ALLSTATE PROPERTY AND CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY


WENDY C. YORK (State Bar No. 166864)

JENNIFER B. EULER (State Bar No. 232378)

YORK LAW CORPORATION

KIMBERLY A. KRALOWEC, (State Bar No. 163158)

THE KRALOWEC LAW GROUP

Attorneys for Plaintiff

ROBERT WATTS

MARK HANOVER (Pro Hoc Vice)

SONIA MARTIN (State Bar No. 191148)

SONNENSCHEIN NATH & ROSENTHAL LLP

Attorneys for Defendants

ALLSTATE INDEMNITY COMPANY,

ALLSTATE INSURANCE COMPANY, and

ALLSTATE PROPERTY AND CASUALTY

INSURANCE COMPANY

STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND PLAINTIFF'S DEADLINE TO FILE

OBJECTIONS AND MOTION TO TAX COSTS

Judge: Hon. Lawrence K. Karlton

Plaintiff Robert Watts and Defendants Allstate, by and through their respective counsel of record, hereby stipulate and agree as follows:

WHEREAS, the Court entered judgment in the present action on May 12, 2011 against Robert Watts;

WHEREAS, Defendants filed a Bill of Costs on May 26, 2011 pursuant to Local Rule 292;

WHEREAS, Plaintiff will file objections to Defendants' Bill of Costs;

WHEREAS, the parties entered into a stipulation to extend Plaintiff's deadline to file his objections and motion to tax costs on September 15, 2011;

WHEREAS, this Court signed the stipulation on July 18, 2011 extending Plaintiff's deadline to September 15, 2011;

WHEREAS, Defendants do not oppose Plaintiff's request that the Court extend Plaintiff's deadline(s) to file said objections and/or motion until 30 days after the Court's Order on Plaintiff's Rule 59(a) and Rule 60 Motions;

WHEREAS, Federal Rule of Civil Procedure Rule 6(b) allows the Court to extend time, for good cause, if the request to extend time is made before the original time expires;

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED that, with the Court's approval, Plaintiff may object to Defendants' Bill of Costs and file a motion to tax costs up to and including 30 days after the Court's Order on Plaintiff's Rule 59(a) and Rule 60 Motions.

IT IS SO STIPULATED.

Respectfully submitted,

YORK LAW CORPORATION

By: WENDY C. YORK

JENNIFER B. EULER

Attorneys for Plaintiff ROBERT WATTS

SONNENSCHEIN NATH & ROSENTHAL LLP

By SONIA MARTIN

Attorneys for Attorneys for Defendants

ALLSTATE INDEMNITY COMPANY,

ALLSTATE INSURANCE COMPANY, and

ALLSTATE PROPERTY AND CASUALTY

INSURANCE COMPANY

IT IS SO ORDERED.

LAWRENCE K. KARLTON

SENIOR JUDGE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT


Summaries of

Watts v. Allstate Indem. Co.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SACRAMENTO DIVISION
Sep 15, 2011
CASE NO.: 2:08-CV-01877-LKK-KJN (E.D. Cal. Sep. 15, 2011)
Case details for

Watts v. Allstate Indem. Co.

Case Details

Full title:ROBERT WATTS, on behalf of himself individually and all other similarly…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SACRAMENTO DIVISION

Date published: Sep 15, 2011

Citations

CASE NO.: 2:08-CV-01877-LKK-KJN (E.D. Cal. Sep. 15, 2011)