From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Watters v. People

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Jan 12, 1961
12 A.D.2d 886 (N.Y. App. Div. 1961)

Opinion

January 12, 1961

Appeal from the Cattaraugus Trial Term.

Present — Williams, P.J., Bastow, Goldman, McClusky and Henry, JJ. [ 23 Misc.2d 402.]


Judgment unanimously affirmed, with costs. Memorandum: We do not understand that the trial court attempted to pass upon the rights of the parties as to ingress and egress or otherwise beyond the boundaries of the premises described in the complaint. Therefore, we do not attempt to pass upon such rights, if any. We recognize the mandatory language of section 1024 of the Civil Practice Act relating to the appointment of commissioners. We agree, however, with the conclusion of the trial court that, under the peculiar circumstances here presented, such appointment would be an unnecessary act and the court correctly dispensed therewith.


Summaries of

Watters v. People

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Jan 12, 1961
12 A.D.2d 886 (N.Y. App. Div. 1961)
Case details for

Watters v. People

Case Details

Full title:DAVID WATTERS et al., Respondents, v. THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: Jan 12, 1961

Citations

12 A.D.2d 886 (N.Y. App. Div. 1961)