Opinion
Argued December 13, 1905
Decided January 9, 1906
A.K. Potter for appellant.
P.F. King for respondent.
Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.
Concur: CULLEN, Ch. J., GRAY, O'BRIEN, BARTLETT, HAIGHT, VANN and WERNER, JJ.
From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research
Wattengel v. Acker Process Company
Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Jan 9, 1906
76 N.E. 1115 (N.Y. 1906)
Summaries of
Wattengel v. Acker Process Company
Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Jan 9, 1906
76 N.E. 1115 (N.Y. 1906)
Case details for
Wattengel v. Acker Process Company
Case Details
Full title:MARY WATTENGEL, Respondent, v . THE ACKER PROCESS COMPANY, Appellant
Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Date published: Jan 9, 1906
Citations
76 N.E. 1115 (N.Y. 1906)
76 N.E. 1115