Watsonville Pilots Association v. City of Watsonville

Full title: WATSONVILLE PILOTS ASSOCIATION et al., Plaintiffs and Respondents, v. CITY…

Court: California Court of Appeals, Sixth District

Date published: Mar 15, 2010

No. H034164 (Cal. Ct. App. Mar. 15, 2010)

Opinion

WATSONVILLE PILOTS ASSOCIATION et al., Plaintiffs and Respondents, v. CITY OF WATSONVILLE et al., Defendants and Appellants CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION, DIVISION OF AERONAUTICS, Respondent. FRIENDS OF BUENA VISTA et al., Plaintiffs and Respondents, v. CITY OF WATSONVILLE et al., Defendants and Appellants; CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION, DIVISION OF AERONAUTICS, Respondent. H034164 California Court of Appeal, Sixth District March 15, 2010

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED

Santa Cruz County Super. Ct. No. CV154571, CV154572.

Mihara, J.

Appellant City of Watsonville (the City) appeals from the trial court’s postjudgment orders awarding attorney’s fees to respondents. The City concedes that its appeal from the attorney’s fees orders is “wholly dependent” on its appeal from the trial court’s judgment. “The City only asks this Court to reverse the fee orders if the City’s appeal from the judgment is successful.” In the City’s appeal from the trial court’s judgment, we rejected its contentions and affirmed the trial court’s judgment. Consequently, the City concedes that this appeal has no merit.

The orders are affirmed.

WE CONCUR: Elia, Acting P. J., McAdams, J.