From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Watson v. Work Wear Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Mar 8, 1994
202 A.D.2d 231 (N.Y. App. Div. 1994)

Opinion

March 8, 1994

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Queens County (Herbert Posner, J.).


Questions of material fact remain as to whether Industrial Garment Manufacturing Company (Industrial), a wholly owned subsidiary of Work Wear Corporation, located in Palestine, Texas, manufactured the contaminated bus driver's uniform eventually worn by plaintiff. Although a label sewn into the uniform pants indicates that a company called "United McEvoy" of Clifton, New Jersey might have been the manufacturer, plaintiff has submitted evidence that another label found in the clothing might be traceable to Industrial. In addition to the contradictory information contained in the two labels, it is not clear from the record whether "United McEvoy" went out of business before the pants in question were manufactured and delivered apparently in the early 1970s. We also note that denial of summary judgment at this juncture was appropriate in view of the still outstanding discovery (CPLR 3212 [f]).

Concur — Rosenberger, J.P., Ellerin, Kupferman, Nardelli and Williams, JJ.


Summaries of

Watson v. Work Wear Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Mar 8, 1994
202 A.D.2d 231 (N.Y. App. Div. 1994)
Case details for

Watson v. Work Wear Corp.

Case Details

Full title:FREDERICK WATSON et al., Respondents, v. WORK WEAR CORPORATION, INC.…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Mar 8, 1994

Citations

202 A.D.2d 231 (N.Y. App. Div. 1994)
608 N.Y.S.2d 459

Citing Cases

Walker v. ABB, Inc.

Before this court addresses this summary judgment motion on the merits, plaintiffs are entitled to use the…

Vasquez v. Heidelberg Harris Inc. [1st Dept 1999

Disclosure from defendant on the issue of whether it or a predecessor or close affiliate manufactured the…