In Goral, sheriffs officers disputed whether the board was legally constituted and had jurisdiction to conduct disciplinary proceedings.
Id. As Presiding Justice Schmidt noted in his dissent in Watson v. Waste Management of Illinois, Inc., 363 Ill. App. 3d 1101, 1106-07 (2006) (Schmidt, P.J., dissenting): "It seems clear from the quo warranto statute that the legislature intended to limit the ability of private individuals to file suit challenging the right of one to hold public office.
