Opinion
March, 1911.
Judgment affirmed, with costs. All concurred, except Spring and Kruse, JJ., who dissented upon the ground that the evidence is sufficient to establish that the conduct of the motorman was reckless.
From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research
Watson v. Syracuse Rapid Transit Railway Company
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Mar 1, 1911
143 App. Div. 959 (N.Y. App. Div. 1911)
Summaries of
Watson v. Syracuse Rapid Transit Railway Company
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Mar 1, 1911
143 App. Div. 959 (N.Y. App. Div. 1911)
Case details for
Watson v. Syracuse Rapid Transit Railway Company
Case Details
Full title:Alexander Watson, Appellant, v. Syracuse Rapid Transit Railway Company…
Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Date published: Mar 1, 1911
Citations
143 App. Div. 959 (N.Y. App. Div. 1911)