From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Watson v. State

COURT OF APPEALS SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH
May 2, 2013
NO. 02-13-00088-CR (Tex. App. May. 2, 2013)

Opinion

NO. 02-13-00088-CRNO. 02-13-00089-CR

05-02-2013

FRANKIE LEE WATSON APPELLANT v. THE STATE OF TEXAS STATE


FROM THE 396TH DISTRICT COURT OF TARRANT COUNTY


MEMORANDUM OPINION

Frankie Lee Watson appealed, and we affirmed, his convictions for aggravated robbery with a deadly weapon. See Watson v. State, Nos. 02-11-00040-CR, 02-11-00041-CR, 2012 WL 117931, at *1, *9 (Tex. App.—Fort Worth Jan. 12, 2012, pet. ref'd) (mem. op., not designated for publication).

After Watson filed another notice of appeal in both cases, we sent him a letter stating our concern that we lacked jurisdiction over the appeals and asked that he, or any party desiring to continue the appeals, file a response by April 1, 2013, showing grounds for continuing the appeals or we would dismiss them for want of jurisdiction. See Tex. R. App. P. 19.3, 44.3. No response has been filed. Therefore, we dismiss the appeals for want of jurisdiction. See Tex. R. App. P. 43.2(f); State v. Holloway, 360 S.W.3d 480, 489 & n.59 (Tex. Crim. App. 2012) (noting that the court of criminal appeals has "always assiduously guarded its exclusive jurisdiction to grant post-conviction habeas corpus relief in felony cases").

PER CURIAM PANEL: MCCOY, MEIER, and GABRIEL, JJ. DO NOT PUBLISH
Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b)

See Tex. R. App. P. 47.4.


Summaries of

Watson v. State

COURT OF APPEALS SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH
May 2, 2013
NO. 02-13-00088-CR (Tex. App. May. 2, 2013)
Case details for

Watson v. State

Case Details

Full title:FRANKIE LEE WATSON APPELLANT v. THE STATE OF TEXAS STATE

Court:COURT OF APPEALS SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH

Date published: May 2, 2013

Citations

NO. 02-13-00088-CR (Tex. App. May. 2, 2013)