From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Watson v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District
Nov 9, 1983
439 So. 2d 271 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1983)

Opinion

No. 82-1510.

September 21, 1983. Rehearing Denied November 9, 1983.

Appeal from the Circuit Court, Broward County, Russell E. Seay, Jr., J.

Wayne F. Watson, pro se.

Jim Smith, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Marlyn J. Altman, Asst. Atty. Gen., West Palm Beach, for appellee.


We reverse appellant's conviction of burglary because it appears without contradiction that appellant was invited to enter and remain in the structure in question by the complaining witness. See Section 810.02(1), Florida Statutes (1979) and State v. Hicks, 421 So.2d 510 (Fla. 1982). The remaining judgments and sentences are affirmed.

Affirmed in part and reversed in part.

HERSEY, GLICKSTEIN and WALDEN, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Watson v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District
Nov 9, 1983
439 So. 2d 271 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1983)
Case details for

Watson v. State

Case Details

Full title:WAYNE F. WATSON, APPELLANT, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District

Date published: Nov 9, 1983

Citations

439 So. 2d 271 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1983)

Citing Cases

Thorpe v. State

Thorpe's position is that there can be no burglary under these facts, which she claims clearly demonstrate…