From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Watson v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION ONE.
Oct 27, 2020
609 S.W.3d 525 (Mo. Ct. App. 2020)

Opinion

No. ED 108550

10-27-2020

Terry WATSON, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.

FOR APPELLANT: Samuel Buffaloe, Woodrail Centre, 1000 West Nifong, Building 7, Suite 100, Columbia, MO 65203. FOR RESPONDENT: Eric S. Schmitt, Attorney General, Shaun J. Mackelprang, Asst. Atty. Gen., P.O. Box 899, Jefferson City, MO 65102.


FOR APPELLANT: Samuel Buffaloe, Woodrail Centre, 1000 West Nifong, Building 7, Suite 100, Columbia, MO 65203.

FOR RESPONDENT: Eric S. Schmitt, Attorney General, Shaun J. Mackelprang, Asst. Atty. Gen., P.O. Box 899, Jefferson City, MO 65102.

Before Colleen Dolan, P.J., Mary K. Hoff, J., and Robert M. Clayton III, J.

ORDER

PER CURIAM. Terry Watson appeals the judgment denying his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief following an evidentiary hearing. We find that the motion court's findings of fact and conclusions of law are not clearly erroneous.

No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. We have, however, provided the parties a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision. The judgment of the motion court is affirmed under Rule 84.16(b).


Summaries of

Watson v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION ONE.
Oct 27, 2020
609 S.W.3d 525 (Mo. Ct. App. 2020)
Case details for

Watson v. State

Case Details

Full title:Terry WATSON, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.

Court:Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION ONE.

Date published: Oct 27, 2020

Citations

609 S.W.3d 525 (Mo. Ct. App. 2020)