From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Watson v. Sch. Bd. of Franklin Par.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA MONROE DIVISION
Nov 17, 2020
CASE NO. 3:20-CV-00527 (W.D. La. Nov. 17, 2020)

Opinion

CASE NO. 3:20-CV-00527

11-17-2020

ESTHER WATSON v. SCHOOL BOARD OF FRANKLIN PARISH


MAG. JUDGE KAREN L. HAYES

JUDGMENT

The Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge [Doc. No. 7] having been considered, no objections having been filed, and finding that the same is supported by the law and the record in this matter,

IT IS ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that the Defendants' motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted [Doc. No. 5-1] is GRANTED and the claims under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 against Superintendent Lanny Johnson and his successor, Eddie Ray Bryan, Ronnie Hatton, Danny Davis, Richard Kelly, Louise Johnson, Tim Eubanks, and Dorothy Brown in their individual capacities are DISMISSED, preserving the plaintiff's claims against Superintendent Lanny Johnson and his successor in their official capacities.

THUS DONE AND SIGNED this 17th day of November, 2020, in Monroe, Louisiana.

/s/_________

TERRY A. DOUGHTY

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Watson v. Sch. Bd. of Franklin Par.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA MONROE DIVISION
Nov 17, 2020
CASE NO. 3:20-CV-00527 (W.D. La. Nov. 17, 2020)
Case details for

Watson v. Sch. Bd. of Franklin Par.

Case Details

Full title:ESTHER WATSON v. SCHOOL BOARD OF FRANKLIN PARISH

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA MONROE DIVISION

Date published: Nov 17, 2020

Citations

CASE NO. 3:20-CV-00527 (W.D. La. Nov. 17, 2020)