Opinion
Argued June 11, 1886
Decided June 25, 1886
Edmund B. Wynn for appellant.
George S. Klock for respondent.
Agree to affirm; no opinion.
All concur.
Judgment affirmed.
From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research
Watson v. Rome, Watertown and Ogdensburg Railroad Co.
Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Jun 25, 1886
102 N.Y. 738 (N.Y. 1886)
Summaries of
Watson v. Rome, Watertown and Ogdensburg Railroad Co.
Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Jun 25, 1886
102 N.Y. 738 (N.Y. 1886)
Case details for
Watson v. Rome, Watertown and Ogdensburg Railroad Co.
Case Details
Full title:MARY WATSON, as Administratrix, etc., Respondent, v . THE ROME, WATERTOWN…
Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Date published: Jun 25, 1886
Citations
102 N.Y. 738 (N.Y. 1886)