Opinion
March 2, 2000
Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Paula Omansky, J.), entered April 27, 1999, dismissing the complaint, and bringing up for review an order which granted defendant's motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint on the ground of collateral estoppel, unanimously affirmed, with costs.
Cheryl Riess-Curtis, for Plaintiff-Appellant.
David A. Boyar, for Defendant-Respondent.
NARDELLI, J.P., TOM, LERNER, RUBIN, FRIEDMAN, JJ.
The complaint alleging legal malpractice was properly dismissed on the ground that a judgment in another action rejecting plaintiff's claim for disability payments upon a finding that his injury was caused by a prexisting medical condition necessarily precludes a finding in this action that but for defendant's negligence the jury in the underlying action would have found that the same injury was caused by plaintiff's fall over a negligently placed waste paper basket. We note in particular the decision of the appellate court in the other action affirming the trial court' s finding that "even if appellant's allegation of falling was true, it was not related in any manner to his disability" (Watson v. American Home Assur. Co., 454 Pa. Super. 293, 304, 685 A.2d 194, 199,lv denied 549 Pa. 704, 700 A.2d 443).
THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER OF SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT.