From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Watson v. Phila. Parking Auth.

United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Feb 16, 2022
Civil Action 21-1514 (E.D. Pa. Feb. 16, 2022)

Opinion

Civil Action 21-1514

02-16-2022

DARRYL WATSON Plaintiff, v. PHILADELPHIA PARKING AUTHORITY, et al . Defendants.


ORDER

CYNTHIA M. RUFE, J.

AND NOW, this 16th day of February 2022, upon consideration of Defendants' Motion to Dismiss [Doc. No. 9] and the response and reply thereto, and for the reasons stated in the accompanying Memorandum Opinion, it is hereby ORDERED that the Motion is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part as follows:

1. The claims for a hostile work environment are DISMISSED without prejudice.
2. The claims against individual Defendants Scott Petri, Richard Dickson, Clarena Tolson, and Darryl White are DISMISSED without prejudice.
3. Plaintiff is granted leave to file a further amended complaint no later than March 9, 2022. If Plaintiff does not file a further amended complaint, then Defendants Philadelphia Parking Authority and Karen Hyers shall answer the Amended Complaint no later than March 23, 2022.

It is so ORDERED.


Summaries of

Watson v. Phila. Parking Auth.

United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Feb 16, 2022
Civil Action 21-1514 (E.D. Pa. Feb. 16, 2022)
Case details for

Watson v. Phila. Parking Auth.

Case Details

Full title:DARRYL WATSON Plaintiff, v. PHILADELPHIA PARKING AUTHORITY, et al …

Court:United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Date published: Feb 16, 2022

Citations

Civil Action 21-1514 (E.D. Pa. Feb. 16, 2022)