From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Watson v. Narine

Court of Appeals of Kansas
Jan 13, 2006
125 P.3d 1089 (Kan. Ct. App. 2006)

Summary

finding improper service on an individual where it was unclear whether the certified mail was even addressed to the individual's "dwelling house or usual place of abode" or whether the person who signed the return receipt was an authorized agent

Summary of this case from Donahue v. Probasco & Assocs., P.A.

Opinion

No. 93,449.

January 13, 2006.

Appeal from Sumner.


Decision without published opinion. Affirmed.


Summaries of

Watson v. Narine

Court of Appeals of Kansas
Jan 13, 2006
125 P.3d 1089 (Kan. Ct. App. 2006)

finding improper service on an individual where it was unclear whether the certified mail was even addressed to the individual's "dwelling house or usual place of abode" or whether the person who signed the return receipt was an authorized agent

Summary of this case from Donahue v. Probasco & Assocs., P.A.
Case details for

Watson v. Narine

Case Details

Full title:WATSON v. NARINE

Court:Court of Appeals of Kansas

Date published: Jan 13, 2006

Citations

125 P.3d 1089 (Kan. Ct. App. 2006)

Citing Cases

Donahue v. Probasco & Assocs., P.A.

ECF No. 53 at 2. See, e.g., Cessna Fin. Corp. v. VYWB, LLC, 982 F. Supp. 2d 1226, 1230-32 (D. Kan. 2013)…

Cessna Finance Corp. v. VYWB, LLC

The Fisher decision does not accommodate Cessna's position that it is enough to prove an unknown third person…