From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Watson v. Hodge

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE AT KNOXVILLE
Mar 8, 2013
No.: 3:12-cv-225 (E.D. Tenn. Mar. 8, 2013)

Opinion

No.: 3:12-cv-225

03-08-2013

TIMOTHY C. WATSON, Plaintiff, v. REUBEN HODGE, TONY HOWERTON, MIKE PARRISH, JASON WOODALL, CORPORAL CASHMOORE, and JOHN DOES #1-5, Defendants.


Judge Phillips


JUDGMENT ORDER

In accordance with the accompanying Memorandum, plaintiff's motion for additional time is DENIED, plaintiff's motion to amend is DENIED, plaintiff's motion for certification is DENIED, and the motion to dismiss filed by defendants Howerton and Parrish is GRANTED. The matter is DISMISSED as to the remaining defendants, and this action is DISMISSED IN ITS ENTIRETY. The court CERTIFIES that any appeal from this action would not be taken in good faith and would be totally frivolous.

ENTER:

Thomas W. Phillips

United States District Judge
ENTERED AS A JUDGMENT

Debra C. Poplin

CLERK OF COURT


Summaries of

Watson v. Hodge

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE AT KNOXVILLE
Mar 8, 2013
No.: 3:12-cv-225 (E.D. Tenn. Mar. 8, 2013)
Case details for

Watson v. Hodge

Case Details

Full title:TIMOTHY C. WATSON, Plaintiff, v. REUBEN HODGE, TONY HOWERTON, MIKE…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE AT KNOXVILLE

Date published: Mar 8, 2013

Citations

No.: 3:12-cv-225 (E.D. Tenn. Mar. 8, 2013)