From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Watson v. Godwin

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
May 3, 2023
2:21-cv-02081-DJC-EFB (HC) (E.D. Cal. May. 3, 2023)

Opinion

2:21-cv-02081-DJC-EFB (HC)

05-03-2023

DAVID WATSON, Petitioner, v. R. GODWIN, Respondent.


ORDER

EDMUND F. BRENNAN UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Petitioner is a state prisoner without counsel seeking a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. He has requested that the court appoint counsel. There currently exists no absolute right to appointment of counsel in habeas proceedings. See Nevius v. Sumner, 105 F.3d 453, 460 (9th Cir. 1996). The court may appoint counsel at any stage of the proceedings “if the interests of justice so require.” See 18 U.S.C. § 3006A; see also, Rule 8(c), Rules Governing § 2254 Cases. The court does not find that the interests of justice would be served by the appointment of counsel at this stage of the proceedings.

Accordingly, it hereby is ORDERED that petitioner's request for appointment of counsel (ECF No. 23) is denied without prejudice.


Summaries of

Watson v. Godwin

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
May 3, 2023
2:21-cv-02081-DJC-EFB (HC) (E.D. Cal. May. 3, 2023)
Case details for

Watson v. Godwin

Case Details

Full title:DAVID WATSON, Petitioner, v. R. GODWIN, Respondent.

Court:United States District Court, Eastern District of California

Date published: May 3, 2023

Citations

2:21-cv-02081-DJC-EFB (HC) (E.D. Cal. May. 3, 2023)