From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

WATSON v. GERMAN GROB SON

Supreme Court, Appellate Term
Jun 1, 1906
51 Misc. 653 (N.Y. App. Term 1906)

Opinion

June, 1906.

J.C. McEachen, for appellant.

William R. Hill, for respondent Grob.

John J. Delany (Theodore Connoly and Thomas F. Noonan, of counsel), for respondent City of New York.


On March 23, 1905, a sewer broke and water came into the cellar of plaintiff doing considerable damage. Plaintiff sued German Grob Son and the City of New York. The complaint was dismissed at the end of plaintiff's case. Plaintiff appeals. The dismissal as against the city was proper. The plaintiff claims that the mere fact of the overflow makes the city liable. The city, however, on the cross-examination of plaintiff's witnesses, showed that the sewer was properly constructed and that the overflow was due to the wrongful act of the other defendant in allowing marble dust to run into the sewer in violation of a city ordinance. Promptly upon notice, the city took steps to remedy the evil. The plaintiff made out a prima facie case against the other defendant.

The judgment is reversed as to the defendant German Grob Son, and a new trial ordered, with costs to appellant to abide the event, and it is affirmed as to the defendant City of New York, with costs.

Present: GILDERSLEEVE, LEVENTRITT and McCALL, JJ.

Judgment reversed as to defendant Grob Son and new trial ordered, with costs to appellant to abide event, and affirmed as to defendant City of New York, with costs.


Summaries of

WATSON v. GERMAN GROB SON

Supreme Court, Appellate Term
Jun 1, 1906
51 Misc. 653 (N.Y. App. Term 1906)
Case details for

WATSON v. GERMAN GROB SON

Case Details

Full title:THOMAS WATSON, Appellant, v . THE CITY OF NEW YORK and GERMAN GROB SON…

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Term

Date published: Jun 1, 1906

Citations

51 Misc. 653 (N.Y. App. Term 1906)