From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Watson v. Evans

Court of Civil Appeals of Texas, Amarillo
Jun 6, 1917
195 S.W. 1170 (Tex. Civ. App. 1917)

Opinion

No. 1184.

June 6, 1917.

Appeal from Dallas County Court; T. A. Works, Judge.

Action by H. S. Watson against Miss E. Evans. From judgment for defendant, plaintiff appeals. Appeal dismissed.

Geo. Clifton Edwards and Nat L. Hardy, both of Dallas, for appellant. Ellis P. House, of Dallas, for appellee.


This was a suit by appellant against appellee to recover usurious interest, and to cancel the claim of appellant for the principal remaining unpaid. Appellant alleged that on December 1, 1914, he borrowed of appellee $60, and paid thereupon $12.90 for seven consecutive months, beginning with January 1, 1915, a total of $90.30, of which amount $30.30 was usurious interest; that about July 1, 1915, he borrowed $20 from appellee, and paid $6 per month on July 1, and August 1, 1915, as usurious interest on said loan; that he had thus paid appellee a total of $42.30 usurious interest, and appellee was still asserting an illegal claim against appellant for $20. He prayed for judgment for $84.60, double the amount of the usurious interest and for "cancellation of any alleged indebtedness, or evidence thereof, asserted by defendant (appellee)."

The charge of usurious interest did not make the agreement to repay the principal void. Appellant could not recover double the amount of the usurious interest, and in addition have a cancellation of the principal indebtedness. He might have the usurious interest paid applied to the principal indebtedness remaining unpaid and cancel it in this way, but this application would then reduce proportionally the amount of the recovery. So that while appellant prayed for judgment for $84.60, and in addition a cancellation of the claim for $20, the statement on its face showed no legal right to such additional relief, and the real amount in controversy was the sum of $84.60. This court is without jurisdiction, and the appeal will be dismissed. Connor v. Sewell, 90 Tex. 275, 38 S.W. 35; Smith v. Wilson, 91 Tex. 503, 44 S.W. 672; Martin v. Jeffries, 153 S.W. 658; Western Union Telegraph Co. v. Arnold, 97 Tex. 365, 77 S.W. 249, 79 S.W. 8; Continental Casualty Co. v. Morris, 46 Tex. Civ. App. 394, 102 S.W. 773.


Summaries of

Watson v. Evans

Court of Civil Appeals of Texas, Amarillo
Jun 6, 1917
195 S.W. 1170 (Tex. Civ. App. 1917)
Case details for

Watson v. Evans

Case Details

Full title:WATSON v. EVANS

Court:Court of Civil Appeals of Texas, Amarillo

Date published: Jun 6, 1917

Citations

195 S.W. 1170 (Tex. Civ. App. 1917)

Citing Cases

Stewart v. Mercantile Bank Trust

It therefore affirmatively appears that the amount asserted in this cross-action was not in controversy in…

Graham & Locke Investments, Inc. v. Madison

The contract is thus left as though it did not provide for interest, but it is not vitiated beyond that.…