Opinion
Civil Action No. 9:05cv190.
January 5, 2006
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION
The Court referred the above-entitled and numbered civil action to United States Magistrate Judge Harry W. McKee. The Magistrate Judge presented for consideration the Magistrate Judge's Report, containing proposed findings of fact and recommendations for disposition of this case. The Report recommends dismissing the petition because Petitioner is not eligible for mandatory supervision and consequently does not have a claim for habeas relief based on line class reduction and loss of good time.
Petitioner filed objections to the Report. Petitioner asserts that he is eligible for mandatory supervision. The TDCJ-CID Commitment Inquiry Information sheet shows that Petitioner is not eligible for mandatory supervision. Response, 11-2 at 2.
This Court made a de novo review of Petitioner's objections and determined that they lack merit. This Court finds that the Magistrate Judge's findings and conclusions are correct, and adopts them as the Court's findings and conclusions. The Court therefore
ORDERS, ADJUDGES, and DECREES that this action is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE; and
ORDERS that all motions not previously ruled on are denied.