From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Watson v. Catalano

United States District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania
Oct 8, 2008
Case No. 3:08-cv-191-KRG-KAP (W.D. Pa. Oct. 8, 2008)

Opinion

Case No. 3:08-cv-191-KRG-KAP.

October 8, 2008


Report and Recommendation


Plaintiff's motion to reconsider, docket no. 15, should be denied.

Plaintiff's motion needs no extended discussion because it reasserts the same flawed position as the objections to the Report and Recommendation which recommended dismissal of the amended complaint. Plaintiff stated and states no racketeering claim, and no predicate acts of mail fraud; even when his pleadings are liberally construed to see if they present a colorable Eighth Amendment claim they are inadequate.

Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), the parties are given notice that they have ten days to serve and file written objections to this Report and Recommendation.


Summaries of

Watson v. Catalano

United States District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania
Oct 8, 2008
Case No. 3:08-cv-191-KRG-KAP (W.D. Pa. Oct. 8, 2008)
Case details for

Watson v. Catalano

Case Details

Full title:EUGENE WATSON, Plaintiff v. MICHAEL CATALANO, JEFFREY BEARD, and RICHARD…

Court:United States District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania

Date published: Oct 8, 2008

Citations

Case No. 3:08-cv-191-KRG-KAP (W.D. Pa. Oct. 8, 2008)