From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Watson v. Beard

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
Nov 1, 2012
Civil Action No. 09 - 87J (W.D. Pa. Nov. 1, 2012)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 09 - 87J

11-01-2012

JOSEPH WATSON, Plaintiff, v. JEFFREY BEARD, et al., Defendants.


Chief Magistrate Judge Lisa Pupo Lenihan

ECF No. 94


MEMORANDUM ORDER

This case is before the Court on Plaintiff's Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings (ECF No. 94) filed October 31, 2012. In his Motion, Plaintiff asserts that the Court has not yet ruled on his access to courts claim contained in his Second Amended Complaint. He also asserts that the Court has not yet ruled on his Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings filed on July 24, 2012.He seeks a ruling on both. Plaintiff, however, is mistaken as the Court has already ruled on both.

This Motion was received by the Court and docketed on August 6, 2012. (ECF No. 87.)

This Court issued a Memorandum Order dated August 21, 2012, whereby it dismissed with prejudice Plaintiff's access to courts claim and denied Plaintiff's Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings as moot as the only relief Plaintiff was seeking was to have the Court rule on the Defendants' Motions to Dismiss. (ECF No. 88.) As a result of the Court's ruling on the Motions to Dismiss, the sole remaining claims left for disposition in this case are Plaintiff's retaliation and Fourth Amendment claims as specified in the Third Circuit's Opinion dated July 11, 2011. Plaintiff's allegations that he did not receive the Court's Memorandum Order dated August 21, 2012, is bellied by the fact that he not only filed Objections to the Court's Order (ECF No. 90) but also an appeal of the Order (ECF No. 92). That interlocutory appeal is now pending before the Third Circuit Court of Appeals. Once the appellate court has made its ruling, this case can proceed with Plaintiff's remaining claims.

Because Plaintiff merely seeks a ruling on his access to courts claim and Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings filed on July 24, 2012, both of which the Court has already ruled upon, his pending Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings will be denied as moot.

AND NOW, this 1st day of November, 2012, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiff's Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings (ECF No. 94) is DENIED as moot.

________

Lisa Pupo Lenihan

Chief United States Magistrate Judge
cc: Joseph Watson

EF-9383

S.C.I. Somerset

1590 Walters Mill Road

Somerset, PA 15510-0001

Via U.S. Mail

Counsel of Record

Via ECF Electronic Mail


Summaries of

Watson v. Beard

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
Nov 1, 2012
Civil Action No. 09 - 87J (W.D. Pa. Nov. 1, 2012)
Case details for

Watson v. Beard

Case Details

Full title:JOSEPH WATSON, Plaintiff, v. JEFFREY BEARD, et al., Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

Date published: Nov 1, 2012

Citations

Civil Action No. 09 - 87J (W.D. Pa. Nov. 1, 2012)