From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Watson v. Astrue

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Jun 20, 2012
Civil Action No. 12-cv-00807-AP (D. Colo. Jun. 20, 2012)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 12-cv-00807-AP

06-20-2012

HERBERT J. WATSON, Plaintiff, v. MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY, Defendant.

For Plaintiff: Hull & Zimmerman, P.C. Michael P. Zimmerman, Esq. For Defendant: Michael S. Howard Special Assistant United States Attorney Assistant Regional Counsel Office of the General Counsel Social Security Administration William G. Pharo Assistant United States Attorney


JOINT CASE MANAGEMENT PLAN FOR SOCIAL SECURITY CASES

1. APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL AND PRO SE PARTIES

For Plaintiff:

Hull & Zimmerman, P.C.

Michael P. Zimmerman, Esq.

For Defendant:

Michael S. Howard

Special Assistant United States Attorney

Assistant Regional Counsel

Office of the General Counsel

Social Security Administration

William G. Pharo

Assistant United States Attorney

2. STATEMENT OF LEGAL BASIS FOR SUBJECT MATTER JURISDICTION

The Court has jurisdiction based on Section 205(g) of the Social Security Act, 42 U.S.C. 405(g).

3. DATES OF FILING OF RELEVANT PLEADINGS

A. Date Complaint Was Filed:

March 29, 2012

B. Date Complaint Was Served on U.S. Attorney's Office:

April 2, 2012

C. Date Answer and Administrative Record Were Filed:

May 30, 2012

4. STATEMENT REGARDING THE ADEQUACY OF THE RECORD

The record is adequate.

5. STATEMENT REGARDING ADDITIONAL EVIDENCE

No additional evidence is anticipated.

6. STATEMENT REGARDING WHETHER THIS CASE RAISES UNUSUAL CLAIMS OR DEFENSES

This matter does not involve any unusual claims or defenses.

7. OTHER MATTERS

Not applicable.

8. BRIEFING SCHEDULE

A. Plaintiff's Opening Brief Due:

July 26, 2012

B. Defendant's Response Brief Due:

August 27, 2012

C. Plaintiff's Reply Brief (If Any) Due:

September 11, 2012

9. STATEMENTS REGARDING ORAL ARGUMENT

A. Plaintiff's Statement:

Plaintiff believes that an oral argument would be appropriate.

B. Defendant's Statement:

Please note that the Commissioner does not request an oral argument at this time.

10. CONSENT TO EXERCISE OF JURISDICTION BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE

A. () All parties have consented to the exercise of jurisdiction of a United States Magistrate Judge.

B. (x) All parties have not consented to the exercise of jurisdiction of a United States Magistrate Judge.

11. OTHER MATTERS

12. AMENDMENTS TO JOINT CASE MANAGEMENT PLAN

BY THE COURT:

John L. Kane

U.S. DISTRICT COURT JUDGE

APPROVED:

Original signature on file at the office

Of Hull & Zimmerman, P.C.

____________________

HULL & ZIMMERMAN, P.C.

MICHAEL P. ZIMMERMAN

Attorneys for Plaintiff

UNITED STATES ATTORNEY

Original signature on file at the Office of

the General Counsel

____________________

By: MICHAEL S. HOWARD

Special Assistant United States Attorney

Assistant Regional Counsel

Office of the General Counsel

Social Security Administration

Attorneys for Defendant


Summaries of

Watson v. Astrue

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Jun 20, 2012
Civil Action No. 12-cv-00807-AP (D. Colo. Jun. 20, 2012)
Case details for

Watson v. Astrue

Case Details

Full title:HERBERT J. WATSON, Plaintiff, v. MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Date published: Jun 20, 2012

Citations

Civil Action No. 12-cv-00807-AP (D. Colo. Jun. 20, 2012)