From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Watson v. 23RD JDC Div "E"

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA
Jan 13, 2016
CIVIL ACTION NO. 15-0716-JJB-EWD (M.D. La. Jan. 13, 2016)

Opinion

CIVIL ACTION NO. 15-0716-JJB-EWD

01-13-2016

MICHAEL WATSON (#82303) v. 23RD JDC DIV "E"


RULING

On October 29, 2015, the Court entered an Order denying the petitioner's Motion to Proceed In Forma Pauperis in this case and directing the petitioner to pay the Court's filing fee ($5.00) to the Clerk of Court within twenty-one (21) days. See R. Doc. 3. The Court's Order specifically advised the petitioner that it was his responsibility to pay the Court's filing fee and that the prison would NOT forward payment of the fee without the petitioner's written authorization. Id. Upon the petitioner's failure to comply with the Court's directive, the Court entered a second Order on December 3, 2015 (R. Doc. 4), directing the plaintiff to appear and show cause, in writing, on or before December 18, 2015. why his habeas corpus application should not be dismissed for failure to pay the Court's filing fee. The Court's Order further directed the petitioner to attach to his response copies of his inmate account transaction statements showing all activity in his inmate accounts for the months of November and December, 2015, including deposits into and withdrawals from the accounts. Id. Finally, the Court's Order advised the petitioner that a failure to comply with the Order "shall" result in the dismissal of the petitioner's action without further notice. Id.

Despite notice and an opportunity to appear, the petitioner has failed to comply with the Court's Order and has failed to provide any explanation for his failure to either pay the Court's filing fee or provide the documentation requested by the Court reflecting the activity in his inmate accounts during the months of November and December, 2015. Accordingly, the petitioner's action shall be dismissed, without prejudice, because of his failure to pay the filing fee or comply with the Court's Orders.

IT IS ORDERED that the above-captioned proceeding be DISMISSED, without prejudice. Judgment shall be entered accordingly.

Baton Rouge, Louisiana, this 13th day of January, 2016.

/s/ _________

JAMES J. BRADY

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Watson v. 23RD JDC Div "E"

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA
Jan 13, 2016
CIVIL ACTION NO. 15-0716-JJB-EWD (M.D. La. Jan. 13, 2016)
Case details for

Watson v. 23RD JDC Div "E"

Case Details

Full title:MICHAEL WATSON (#82303) v. 23RD JDC DIV "E"

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA

Date published: Jan 13, 2016

Citations

CIVIL ACTION NO. 15-0716-JJB-EWD (M.D. La. Jan. 13, 2016)