From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Watson Farley & Williams LLP v. Bay Bridge Tex., LLC

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK NEW YORK COUNTY PART IAS MOTION 3EFM
Apr 1, 2019
2019 N.Y. Slip Op. 30916 (N.Y. Sup. Ct. 2019)

Opinion

INDEX NO. 655773/2017

04-01-2019

WATSON FARLEY & WILLIAMS LLP, Plaintiff, v. BAY BRIDGE TEXAS, LLC, Defendant.


NYSCEF DOC. NO. 24 PRESENT: HON. JOEL M. COHEN Justice MOTION DATE 11/08/2018 MOTION SEQ. NO. 001

DECISION AND ORDER

The following e-filed documents, listed by NYSCEF document number (Motion 001) 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23 were read on this motion for JUDGMENT - DEFAULT. Upon the foregoing documents:

Plaintiff Watson Farley & Williams LLP moves for a default judgment, pursuant to CPLR § 3215, against Defendant Bay Bridge Texas, LLC, for failure to timely appear, answer, or otherwise move with respect to the complaint. For the reasons described below, the unopposed motion for default judgment is granted.

Plaintiff has submitted unrebutted evidence demonstrating compliance with the requirements of CPLR §3215. Therefore, Plaintiff's motion for default judgment is granted as to liability. The relief sought in the Verified Complaint is for a sum certain of $86,560.25, with pre-judgment interest in the amount of $1,731.22. As such, Plaintiff's motion for default judgment is granted as to damages.

Plaintiff also seeks attorneys' fees. Claims for attorneys' fees "are not ordinarily amenable to characterization as claims for 'sums certain.'" Arent Fox Kintner Plotkin & Kahn v. Lurzer GmbH, 297 A.D.2d 590 (1st Dep't 2002); Reynolds Secs. v. Underwriters Bank & Trust Co., 44 N.Y.2d 568 at 572 (1978) (holding that to be considered a "sum certain" there can be no dispute as to the amount due). Therefore, because attorneys' fees are not treated by courts as a sum certain, Plaintiff shall be directed to an Inquest to determine the issue of attorneys' fees.

Defendant may seek a vacatur of the instant default judgment if they can satisfy the requirements of CPLR §5015, CPLR §317, or any other relevant law.

Therefore it is:

ORDERED that Plaintiff's Motion for a Default Judgment against Defendant is Granted, and the Clerk of the Court is directed to enter a judgment in favor of Plaintiff and against Defendant for the amount alleged in the complaint, $86,560.25, with pre-judgment interest in the amount of $1,731.22, totaling $88,291.47, together with costs and disbursements as taxed by the Clerk upon submission of an appropriate bill of costs; and it is further

ORDERED that Plaintiff's request for damages as to the second cause of action is referred to a JHO to hear and determine; and it is further

ORDERED that Plaintiff's request for attorneys' fees is referred to a Judicial Hearing Officer ("JHO") to hear and determine; and it is further

ORDERED that a JHO or Special Referee shall be designated to determine the attorneys' fees owed to Plaintiff; and it is further

ORDERED that the powers of the JHO/Special Referee to determine shall not be limited further than as set forth in the CPLR; and it is further

ORDERED that this matter is hereby referred to the Special Referee Clerk (Room 119 M, 646-386-3028 or spref@courts.state.ny.us) for placement at the earliest possible date upon the calendar of the Special Referees Part (Part SRP), which, in accordance with the Rules of that Part (which are posted on the website of this Court at www.nycourts.gov/supctmanh at the "Local Rules" link), shall assign this matter to an available Special Referee to determine as specified above; and it is further

ORDERED that plaintiff's counsel shall serve a copy of this order with notice of entry on defendant within five days and that counsel for plaintiff shall, after thirty days from service of those papers, submit to the Special Referee Clerk by fax (212-401-9186) or email an Information Sheet (which can be accessed at http://www.nycourts.gov/courts/1jd/supctmanh/refpart-infosheet-10-09.pdf) containing all the information called for therein and that, as soon as practical thereafter, the Special Referee Clerk shall advise counsel for the parties of the date fixed for the appearance of the matter upon the calendar of the Special Referees Part; and it is further

ORDERED that the hearing will be conducted in the same manner as a trial before a Justice without a jury (CPLR § 4318) (the proceeding will be recorded by a court reporter, the rules of evidence apply, etc.) and that the parties shall appear for the reference hearing, including with all such witnesses and evidence as they may seek to present, and shall be ready to proceed, on the date first fixed by the Special Referee Clerk subject only to any adjournment that may be authorized by the Special Referee's Part in accordance with the Rules of that Part; and it is further

ORDERED that, except as otherwise directed by the assigned JHO/Special Referee for good cause shown, the trial of the issue specified above shall proceed from day to day until completion.

This constitutes the Decision and Order of the Court. 4/1/2019

DATE

/s/ _________

Joel M. Cohen, J.S.C.


Summaries of

Watson Farley & Williams LLP v. Bay Bridge Tex., LLC

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK NEW YORK COUNTY PART IAS MOTION 3EFM
Apr 1, 2019
2019 N.Y. Slip Op. 30916 (N.Y. Sup. Ct. 2019)
Case details for

Watson Farley & Williams LLP v. Bay Bridge Tex., LLC

Case Details

Full title:WATSON FARLEY & WILLIAMS LLP, Plaintiff, v. BAY BRIDGE TEXAS, LLC…

Court:SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK NEW YORK COUNTY PART IAS MOTION 3EFM

Date published: Apr 1, 2019

Citations

2019 N.Y. Slip Op. 30916 (N.Y. Sup. Ct. 2019)