Watkins–Israyl v. State

Full title: Carl WATKINS–ISRAYL, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.

Court: Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One.

Date published: Dec 18, 2012

392 S.W.3d 500 (Mo. Ct. App. 2012)

Opinion

No. ED 98233.

2012-12-18

Carl WATKINS–ISRAYL, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.

Appeal from the Circuit Court of St. Louis County, 11SL–CC02004, Robert S. Cohen, Judge. Andrew E. Zleit, Saint Louis, MO, for Appellant. Chris Koster, Attorney General, Timothy A. Blackwell, Assistant Attorney General, Jefferson City, MO, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM.

Appeal from the Circuit Court of St. Louis County, 11SL–CC02004, Robert S. Cohen, Judge.
Andrew E. Zleit, Saint Louis, MO, for Appellant. Chris Koster, Attorney General, Timothy A. Blackwell, Assistant Attorney General, Jefferson City, MO, for Respondent.
Before CLIFFORD H. AHRENS, P.J., SHERRI B. SULLIVAN, J. and GLENN A. NORTON, J.

ORDER

Carl Watkins–Israyl appeals the judgment denying his Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief without an evidentiary hearing. We find that the motion court's findings of fact and conclusions of law are not clearly erroneous.

An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided the parties a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision. The judgment of the motion court is affirmed under Rule 84.16(b).