From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Watkins v. Singh

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Nov 28, 2012
No. 2: 12-cv-1343 GEB JFM (PC) (E.D. Cal. Nov. 28, 2012)

Opinion

No. 2: 12-cv-1343 GEB JFM (PC)

11-28-2012

NOEL KEITH WATKINS, Plaintiff, v. VAMIL SINGH, et al., Defendants.


ORDER

Plaintiff has filed a motion for extension of time to file an amended complaint. (See Dkt. No. 15.) Good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. Plaintiff's November 20, 2012 motion for an extension of time (Dkt. No. 15.) is GRANTED;

2. Plaintiff is granted thirty (30) days from the date of this order in which to file an amended complaint; and

3. Plaintiff's November 26, 2012 motion for an extension of time (Dkt. No. 16.) is denied as duplicative.

______________________________

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE


Summaries of

Watkins v. Singh

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Nov 28, 2012
No. 2: 12-cv-1343 GEB JFM (PC) (E.D. Cal. Nov. 28, 2012)
Case details for

Watkins v. Singh

Case Details

Full title:NOEL KEITH WATKINS, Plaintiff, v. VAMIL SINGH, et al., Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Nov 28, 2012

Citations

No. 2: 12-cv-1343 GEB JFM (PC) (E.D. Cal. Nov. 28, 2012)