Watkins v. Singh

Full title: NOEL KEITH WATKINS, Plaintiff, v. VAMIL SINGH, et al., Defendants.

Court: United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, E.D. California

Date published: Dec 13, 2012

2:12-cv-1343 GEB JFM (PC) (E.D. Cal. Dec. 13, 2012)

Opinion

NOEL KEITH WATKINS, Plaintiff, v. VAMIL SINGH, et al., Defendants. No. 2:12-cv-1343 GEB JFM (PC). United States District Court, E.D. California. December 13, 2012.

          ORDER

          GARLAND E. BURRELL, Jr., Senior District Judge.

         Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302.

         On October 17, 2012, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein which were served on plaintiff and which contained notice to plaintiff that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. Plaintiff has filed objections to the findings and recommendations.

         In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule 304, this court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the court finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by proper analysis.

         Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

         1. The findings and recommendations filed October 17, 2012, are adopted in full; and

         2. Plaintiff's August 13, 2012 and September 26, 2012 motions are denied.