From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

WATKINS v. PUHL

United States District Court, E.D. California
Aug 4, 2006
No. CIV S-06-0786 DFL CMK P (E.D. Cal. Aug. 4, 2006)

Opinion

No. CIV S-06-0786 DFL CMK P.

August 4, 2006


ORDER


Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local General Order No. 262.

On April 25, 2006, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein which were served on plaintiff and which contained notice to plaintiff that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within twenty days. Plaintiff has filed objections to the findings and recommendations.

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule 72-304, this court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the court finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by proper analysis. Plaintiff fails to understand that he has no federal entitlement to be assigned to the fire camp. Because he has no federal right to such an assignment, neither does he have a federal right to any particular procedure in the assignment process.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The findings and recommendations filed April 25, 2006, are adopted in full; and

2. Plaintiff's complaint is dismissed for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted.


Summaries of

WATKINS v. PUHL

United States District Court, E.D. California
Aug 4, 2006
No. CIV S-06-0786 DFL CMK P (E.D. Cal. Aug. 4, 2006)
Case details for

WATKINS v. PUHL

Case Details

Full title:ILLYA N. WATKINS, Plaintiff, v. B. PUHL, et al., Defendants

Court:United States District Court, E.D. California

Date published: Aug 4, 2006

Citations

No. CIV S-06-0786 DFL CMK P (E.D. Cal. Aug. 4, 2006)