From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Watkins v. Haynes

United States District Court, N.D. West Virginia
Nov 8, 2007
Civil Action No. 2:06cv42 (N.D.W. Va. Nov. 8, 2007)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 2:06cv42.

November 8, 2007


ORDER GRANTING PETITIONER'S MOTION TO PROCEED IFP ON APPEAL


On November 6, 2007, the Court received the pro se petitioner's Motion and Affidavit for Permission to Appeal In Forma Pauperis ("IFP") with attached ledger sheets. Upon review of those documents, the Court finds that the petitioner does not have any substantial assets and, on average, makes less than $5 a month from his prison employment. Although the petitioner receives funds from outside sources on a regular basis, he does not have sufficient funds to cover the appellate filing fee. Accordingly, pursuant to Rule 24(a) of the Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure, the petitioner's Motion to Appeal In Forma Pauperis (dckt. 42) is GRANTED.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

The Clerk is directed to transmit a copy of this Order to the pro se petitioner, counsel of record, and the Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals.


Summaries of

Watkins v. Haynes

United States District Court, N.D. West Virginia
Nov 8, 2007
Civil Action No. 2:06cv42 (N.D.W. Va. Nov. 8, 2007)
Case details for

Watkins v. Haynes

Case Details

Full title:CHRISTOPHER M. WATKINS, Petitioner, v. AL HAYNES, Warden, Respondent

Court:United States District Court, N.D. West Virginia

Date published: Nov 8, 2007

Citations

Civil Action No. 2:06cv42 (N.D.W. Va. Nov. 8, 2007)