From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Watkins v. Gmac Mortg., LLC

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA
Oct 6, 2014
Case No.: 2:12-cv-1371-GMN-GWF (D. Nev. Oct. 6, 2014)

Opinion

Case No.: 2:12-cv-1371-GMN-GWF

10-06-2014

Janet Watkins, Plaintiff, v. GMAC Mortgage, LLC, Defendant.


ORDER

Pending before the Court is the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge George W. Foley, (ECF No. 49), which states that the pending Motion to Enforce Settlement Agreement, (ECF No. 43), should be granted.

A party may file specific written objections to the findings and recommendations of a United States Magistrate Judge made pursuant to Local Rule IB 1-4. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B); D. Nev. R. IB 3-2. Upon the filing of such objections, the Court must make a de novo determination of those portions to which objections are made. Id. The Court may accept, reject, or modify, in whole or in part, the findings or recommendations made by the Magistrate Judge. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); D. Nev. IB 3-2(b). Where a party fails to object, however, the Court is not required to conduct "any review at all . . . of any issue that is not the subject of an objection." Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 149 (1985). Indeed, the Ninth Circuit has recognized that a district court is not required to review a magistrate judge's report and recommendation where no objections have been filed. See, e.g., United States v. Reyna-Tapia, 328 F.3d 1114, 1122 (9th Cir. 2003).

Here, no objections were filed, and the deadline to do so has passed.

Accordingly,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Report and Recommendation, (ECF No. 49), is ADOPTED in full.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendant's Motion to Deem the Settlement Agreement Executed, (ECF No. 43), is GRANTED.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Settlement Agreement reached between the parties at the August 13, 2013, settlement conference is deemed fully executed.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this action is dismissed with prejudice. The Clerk shall enter judgment accordingly and close the case.

DATED this 6th day of October, 2014.

/s/_________

Gloria M. Navarro, Chief Judge

United States District Court


Summaries of

Watkins v. Gmac Mortg., LLC

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA
Oct 6, 2014
Case No.: 2:12-cv-1371-GMN-GWF (D. Nev. Oct. 6, 2014)
Case details for

Watkins v. Gmac Mortg., LLC

Case Details

Full title:Janet Watkins, Plaintiff, v. GMAC Mortgage, LLC, Defendant.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA

Date published: Oct 6, 2014

Citations

Case No.: 2:12-cv-1371-GMN-GWF (D. Nev. Oct. 6, 2014)