From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Watkins Motor v. Imperial Freight

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
Sep 9, 1986
493 So. 2d 545 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1986)

Opinion

No. 86-363.

September 9, 1986.

Appeal from the Circuit Court, Dade County, Fredricka G. Smith, J.

Silver Silver and Ira S. Silver, Miami, for appellant.

Yelen Yelen and Jan A. Yelen, Coral Gables, for appellee.

Before SCHWARTZ, C.J., and NESBITT and JORGENSON, JJ.


We reverse the trial court's finding that certain short form bills of lading were sufficiently ambiguous so as to require the admission of parol evidence to determine the intent of the parties. The nonrecourse provision in the bills of lading is clear, and Imperial Freight's failure to sign that provision creates liability as a matter of law. Southern Pacific Transportation Co. v. Commercial Metals Co., 456 U.S. 336, 342-44, 102 S.Ct. 1815, 1820-21, 72 L.Ed.2d 114, 120-21 (1982); Missouri Pacific Railroad v. Center Plains Industries, Inc., 720 F.2d 818 (5th Cir. 1983). Accordingly, we remand with directions to enter judgment for the appellant, Watkins Motor Lines, in the amount requested.

Reversed and remanded with directions.


Summaries of

Watkins Motor v. Imperial Freight

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
Sep 9, 1986
493 So. 2d 545 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1986)
Case details for

Watkins Motor v. Imperial Freight

Case Details

Full title:WATKINS MOTOR LINES, INC., APPELLANT, v. IMPERIAL FREIGHT BROKERS, INC.…

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District

Date published: Sep 9, 1986

Citations

493 So. 2d 545 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1986)