holding that the "owned property" exclusion containing a clause excluding costs incurred to prevent damage to third- party property was not subject to an exception for costs incurred to prevent damage to third-party property
Summary of this case from Clarinet, LLC v. Essex Ins. Co.No. 2009AP002465.
June 17, 2010.
Table of Unpublished Opinions Affirmed.
holding that the "owned property" exclusion containing a clause excluding costs incurred to prevent damage to third- party property was not subject to an exception for costs incurred to prevent damage to third-party property
Summary of this case from Clarinet, LLC v. Essex Ins. Co.Full title:Watertown Tire Recycles, LLC v. NortMan
Court:Court of Appeals of Wisconsin
Date published: Jun 17, 2010
Other courts have reach differing conclusions. Compare Aetna Cas. & Sur. Co. v. Dow Chem. Co., 28 F. Supp. 2d…