From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Waterside 1 LLC v. Christian

Appellate Term of the Supreme Court of New York
Nov 27, 2006
2006 N.Y. Slip Op. 52229 (N.Y. App. Term 2006)

Opinion

2005-1936 Q C.

Decided November 27, 2006.

Appeal from an order of the Civil Court of the City of New York, Queens County (Anne Katz, J.), entered October 22, 2004. The order denied landlord's motion to vacate a stipulation of settlement in a nonpayment summary proceeding.

Order affirmed without costs.

PRESENT: PESCE, P.J., GOLIA and RIOS, JJ.


Landlord commenced this nonpayment summary proceeding against tenants in April 2003 seeking to recover alleged monthly rent of $554.33 for the months of November 2002 through April 2003. The parties entered into a stipulation of settlement, dated December 29, 2003, wherein tenants consented to the entry of a final judgment in the sum of $5,474.74, based on the monthly rent alleged in the petition. Landlord thereafter sought to set aside the stipulation on the ground of mutual mistake. Landlord contended that the regulated rent, which had been reduced to the sum of $554.33 by an order of the Division of Housing and Community Renewal (DHCR), had been restored by a subsequent DHCR order issued April 12, 2002, but that it had not learned of the DHCR order restoring rent when it entered into the stipulation of settlement on December 29, 2003. The Civil Court ruled that the facts alleged did not constitute a basis to set aside the stipulation on the ground of mutual mistake.

Where a mistake of fact is attributable to the negligence or carelessness of the party seeking to vacate a stipulation, and there has been no fraud or deceit on the part of the other party thereto, such a mistake will not constitute a basis to set aside the agreement ( see Da Silva v Musso, 53 NY2d 543, 552; Lowe v Steinman, 284 AD2d 506, 508). Since landlord had an opportunity to ascertain whether the rent had been restored prior to the commencement of the proceeding and the execution of the stipulation of settlement, it cannot avoid the consequences of its own carelessness by seeking to have the stipulation vacated. Accordingly, the order of the court below is affirmed.

Pesce, P.J., Golia and Rios, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Waterside 1 LLC v. Christian

Appellate Term of the Supreme Court of New York
Nov 27, 2006
2006 N.Y. Slip Op. 52229 (N.Y. App. Term 2006)
Case details for

Waterside 1 LLC v. Christian

Case Details

Full title:WATERSIDE 1 LLC, Appellant, against IRVIN CHRISTIAN and VALERIA CHRISTIAN…

Court:Appellate Term of the Supreme Court of New York

Date published: Nov 27, 2006

Citations

2006 N.Y. Slip Op. 52229 (N.Y. App. Term 2006)