From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Waters v. Kmart Corporation

United States District Court, D. Minnesota
Jul 24, 2008
Civil No. 08-0012 (JRT/JJK) (D. Minn. Jul. 24, 2008)

Summary

holding that a plaintiff's amended complaint "related back" to the claims asserted in an EEOC Charge incorporated into his original complaint

Summary of this case from Omar-Taylor v. Hennepin Cnty. Human Servs. & Public Health Dep't

Opinion

Civil No. 08-0012 (JRT/JJK).

July 24, 2008

Stephen C. Fiebiger, STEPHEN C. FIEBIGER ASSOCIATES, CHARTERED, Burnsville, MN, for plaintiff.

Kathryn Mrkonich Wilson and Reagan W. Oden, LITTLER MENDELSON, PC, Minneapolis, MN, for defendant.


ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION


The above-entitled matter comes before the Court upon the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Jeffrey J. Keyes, dated July 11, 2008, all the files and records, and no objections having been filed to said Report and Recommendation.

Based upon the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge, and all of the files, records and proceedings herein, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that defendants' Motion to dismiss [Docket No. 9] is DENIED.


Summaries of

Waters v. Kmart Corporation

United States District Court, D. Minnesota
Jul 24, 2008
Civil No. 08-0012 (JRT/JJK) (D. Minn. Jul. 24, 2008)

holding that a plaintiff's amended complaint "related back" to the claims asserted in an EEOC Charge incorporated into his original complaint

Summary of this case from Omar-Taylor v. Hennepin Cnty. Human Servs. & Public Health Dep't
Case details for

Waters v. Kmart Corporation

Case Details

Full title:WILLIE E. WATERS, Plaintiff, v. KMART CORPORATION, Defendant

Court:United States District Court, D. Minnesota

Date published: Jul 24, 2008

Citations

Civil No. 08-0012 (JRT/JJK) (D. Minn. Jul. 24, 2008)

Citing Cases

Omar-Taylor v. Hennepin Cnty. Human Servs. & Public Health Dep't

Hennepin County knew that Omar had alleged retaliation in her administrative charge, which was attached to…

Miller v. Mo. Dep't of Soc. Servs. Div. of Youth Servs.

Therefore, Defendant was on notice that Plaintiff is asserting an ADA claim. See Brown v. City of…