From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Waterman v. Nelson

United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit
Mar 24, 1952
195 F.2d 523 (2d Cir. 1952)

Opinion

No. 196, Docket 22179.

Argued March 10, 1952.

Decided March 24, 1952.

Corinne C. Waterman, pro se.

Myles J. Lane, U.S. Atty., New York City (Robert Rubinger, Asst. U.S. Atty., New York City, of counsel), for appellees.

Before SWAN, Chief Judge, and CLARK and FRANK, Circuit Judges.


This is an appeal from an order of March 3, 1951 dismissing the complaint for want of prosecution. Plaintiff also appeals from an order of May 11 denying her motion to vacate the prior order and to cite for contempt the former United States Attorney and one of his assistants. The case was previously here in 1949. Waterman v. Nelson, 2 Cir., 177 F.2d 965. As appears from that opinion only one of the defendants, Rossell, was then subject to the court's jurisdiction. None of the others had appeared or been served with process. Nor has any of them yet been served or entered appearance. The complaint was properly dismissed for failure to effect service and prosecute the action. Rule 4(d)(5) and Rule 41(b), Fed.R.Civ.P. 28 U.S.C. As to service upon the United States Civil Service Commission and the Veterans Administration, see Blackmar v. Guerre, 72 S.Ct. 410. Denial of plaintiff's motions by the order of May 11th was also correct. Both orders are affirmed.


Summaries of

Waterman v. Nelson

United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit
Mar 24, 1952
195 F.2d 523 (2d Cir. 1952)
Case details for

Waterman v. Nelson

Case Details

Full title:WATERMAN v. NELSON et al

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit

Date published: Mar 24, 1952

Citations

195 F.2d 523 (2d Cir. 1952)

Citing Cases

Zink v. Hartford Corr. Ctr.

The Court therefore finds that all claims against any John Doe defendants should be DISMISSED, for failure to…

Gilbert v. Goord

Courts have the power to order such dismissal sua sponte under the doctrine set forth by the Supreme Court in…