From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Waterman v. Bd. of Comm'rs

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF KANSAS
May 13, 2019
Case No. 18-3135-CM-KGG (D. Kan. May. 13, 2019)

Opinion

Case No. 18-3135-CM-KGG

05-13-2019

BRIAN WATERMAN, Plaintiff, v. BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS OF COLUMBUS, KANSAS, et al., Defendants.


MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

Plaintiff Brian Waterman, a prisoner in the Sedgwick County Jail, brings this civil rights action pro se against a number of defendants associated with Cherokee County Jail. The case is before the court on several motions, but the court only addresses one here: plaintiff's Motion for Default Judgment (Doc. 108).

Plaintiff claims that defendants Jonathan Manzer, Manzer Health Clinic, and APRN Kristin Wagner failed to answer summons. But instead of filing an answer, defendants Manzer and Manzer Health Clinic timely filed motions to dismiss (Docs. 93-96.) Under the Fed. R. Civ. P. 12, defendants have the option of whether to file an answer or a pre-answer motion. Default judgment is not appropriate against defendant Manzer and Manzer Health Clinic.

As for defendant APRN Kristin Wagner, it does not appear that a waiver of service or a return of service has been filed. Because it does not appear that this defendant has been served with process, default judgment is also not appropriate against her.

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that plaintiff's Motion for Default Judgment (Doc. 108) is denied.

Dated this 13th day of May, 2019, at Kansas City, Kansas.

s/ Carlos Murguia

CARLOS MURGUIA

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Waterman v. Bd. of Comm'rs

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF KANSAS
May 13, 2019
Case No. 18-3135-CM-KGG (D. Kan. May. 13, 2019)
Case details for

Waterman v. Bd. of Comm'rs

Case Details

Full title:BRIAN WATERMAN, Plaintiff, v. BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS OF COLUMBUS, KANSAS…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF KANSAS

Date published: May 13, 2019

Citations

Case No. 18-3135-CM-KGG (D. Kan. May. 13, 2019)