From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Waterhouse v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue

United States Tax Court
Jun 3, 2021
No. 9004-20 (U.S.T.C. Jun. 3, 2021)

Opinion

9004-20

06-03-2021

James F. Waterhouse, Deceased Petitioner v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue Respondent


ORDER

Maurice B. Foley, Chief Judge

On October 19, 2020, respondent filed a Motion To Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction as to Petitioner James F. Waterhouse, Deceased. On October 21, 2020, the Court issued an Order To Show Cause which erroneously recharacterized that motion as a Motion To Dismiss for Lack of Prosecution and which directed Vivian Rowland, or any other person duly authorized to represent the interests of James F. Waterhouse, Deceased, to show cause why the Court should not grant respondent's motion to dismiss for lack of prosecution.

Upon due consideration and for cause, it is

ORDERED that the Court's Order To Show Cause dated October 21, 2020, is hereby stricken from the record in this case. It is further

ORDERED that, on or before July 1, 2021, petitioner (or any person duly authorized to act on his behalf) shall file an Objection, if any, to respondent's Motion To Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction. Failure to comply with this Order may result in the granting of respondent's motion to dismiss.


Summaries of

Waterhouse v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue

United States Tax Court
Jun 3, 2021
No. 9004-20 (U.S.T.C. Jun. 3, 2021)
Case details for

Waterhouse v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue

Case Details

Full title:James F. Waterhouse, Deceased Petitioner v. Commissioner of Internal…

Court:United States Tax Court

Date published: Jun 3, 2021

Citations

No. 9004-20 (U.S.T.C. Jun. 3, 2021)