Opinion
(No. 7682)
Robert L. Hirtle, for the defendant (appellant).
No appearance for the plaintiff (appellee).
Argued May 6, 1975
Decided May 6, 1975
It appearing that the defendant in the above-entitled case has failed to prosecute its appeal from the Superior Court in Hartford County with proper diligence, it is, under Practice Book § 696, ordered by the Supreme Court, suo motu, that the appeal be and hereby is dismissed unless the defendant files its brief on or before June 4, 1975.