From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Watch Rapport, LLC v. Grenny

United States District Court, Central District of California
Jun 24, 2024
2:23-CV-02154-SPG-RAO (C.D. Cal. Jun. 24, 2024)

Opinion

2:23-CV-02154-SPG-RAO

06-24-2024

WATCH RAPPORT, LLC, Plaintiff, v. SETH GRENNY, DOES 1-20, inclusive, Defendants. SETH GRENNY, Counterclaimant, v. WATCH RAPPORT, LLC, Counter-Defendant.


Rozella A. Oliver, Magistrate Judge.

JUDGMENT

HON. SHERILYN PEACE GARNETT UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE.

The Court having considered the Stipulation for Entry of Judgment filed herein (“Stipulation”), and good cause appearing therefore, the Court finds as follows:

1. After reviewing the facts in the parties Stipulation and as set forth in Mr. Grenny's Counterclaims on file in this Court, the Court finds that Defendant Watch Rapport, LLC breached obligations to Mr. Grenny.
2. As a direct and proximate result of those breaches, Mr. Grenny was harmed in
the amount of $132,056.47.
3. Post-judgment interest shall be calculated at the statutory rate.

The Court therefore enters judgment in favor of Seth Grenny and against Watch Rapport, LLC as follows:

1. Judgment is entered in the amount of $132,056.47.
2. Post-judgment interest shall be calculated on the principal amount of $132,056.47 at the statutory rate.

IT IS SO FOUND, ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED.


Summaries of

Watch Rapport, LLC v. Grenny

United States District Court, Central District of California
Jun 24, 2024
2:23-CV-02154-SPG-RAO (C.D. Cal. Jun. 24, 2024)
Case details for

Watch Rapport, LLC v. Grenny

Case Details

Full title:WATCH RAPPORT, LLC, Plaintiff, v. SETH GRENNY, DOES 1-20, inclusive…

Court:United States District Court, Central District of California

Date published: Jun 24, 2024

Citations

2:23-CV-02154-SPG-RAO (C.D. Cal. Jun. 24, 2024)