Wasko v. General Kinetics, Inc.

Full title: STEPHEN WASKO, JR., Plaintiff, v. GENERAL KINETICS, INC., Defendant

Court: United States District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania

Date published: Jul 19, 2007

Case No. 3:04-cv-223-KRG-KAP (W.D. Pa. Jul. 19, 2007)

Opinion

Case No. 3:04-cv-223-KRG-KAP.

July 19, 2007

MEMORANDUM ORDER

KIM GIBSON, District Judge

This matter was referred to Magistrate Judge Keith A. Pesto for pretrial proceedings in accordance with the Magistrates Act, 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), and subsections 3 and 4 of Local Rule 72.1 for Magistrate Judges.

The Magistrate Judge filed a Report and Recommendation on June 22, 2007, docket no. 24, recommending that the defendant's motion for summary judgment, docket no. 17, be granted.

The parties were notified that pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), they had ten days to serve and file written objections to the Report and Recommendation. No objections have been filed and the time to do so has expired.

Upon review of the record of this matter and the Report and Recommendation, and noting the absence of timely objections thereto, the following order is entered:

AND NOW, this 18^th day of July, 2007, it is

ORDERED that defendant's motion for summary judgment, docket no. 17, is granted. The Report and Recommendation is adopted as the opinion of the Court. The Clerk shall enter judgment for the defendant and mark this matter closed.