From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Washtok v. Bayless

Oregon Supreme Court
Jan 4, 1974
517 P.2d 660 (Or. 1974)

Opinion

Argued December 3, 1973

Affirmed January 4, 1974

Appeal from Circuit Court, Washington County.

GLEN HIEBER, Judge.

AFFIRMED.

Francis E. Harrington, Portland, argued the cause for appellants. With him on the brief were Brink Moore, Hillsboro.

Ridgway K. Foley, Jr., argued the cause for respondents. With him on the brief were Souther, Spaulding, Kinsey, Williamson Schwabe and A. Allan Franzke, Portland.

Before O'CONNELL, Chief Justice, and McALLISTER, HOLMAN, HOWELL and BRYSON, Justices.


This is an action of deceit to recover damages for an alleged misrepresentation by defendants as to the condition of an apartment complex which they sold to plaintiffs. Plaintiffs appeal from a directed verdict for defendants.

Plaintiffs bought the property in 1968. In 1969 they discovered that the pipes in the entire water distribution system were pitted and corroded as a result of electrolysis. The complaint alleges that the sellers knew of the condition of the pipes at the time of sale but concealed the fact from plaintiffs.

We have carefully examined the record and can find no evidence from which the jury could draw the inference that defendants or their agents practiced any kind of deception upon plaintiffs to induce the sale.

We conclude, therefore, that the trial court properly directed a verdict in favor of defendants and that the judgment must be affirmed.


Summaries of

Washtok v. Bayless

Oregon Supreme Court
Jan 4, 1974
517 P.2d 660 (Or. 1974)
Case details for

Washtok v. Bayless

Case Details

Full title:WASHTOK ET AL, Appellants, v. BAYLESS ET UX, Respondents

Court:Oregon Supreme Court

Date published: Jan 4, 1974

Citations

517 P.2d 660 (Or. 1974)
517 P.2d 660