From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Washington v. Washington

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Sep 19, 2006
32 A.D.3d 964 (N.Y. App. Div. 2006)

Opinion

2005-10811.

September 19, 2006.

In a family offense proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 8, the petitioner appeals from an order of the Family Court, Queens County (S. Modica, J.), dated October 19, 2005, which, after a hearing, dismissed the petition.

Carol Kahn, New York, N.Y., for appellant.

Before: Miller, J.P., Luciano, Rivera and Spolzino, JJ.


Ordered that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

The determination as to whether a respondent has committed acts constituting a cognizable family offense (see Family Ct Act § 832) is a factual issue for the Family Court to resolve ( see Matter of King v Flowers, 13 AD3d 629), and that determination is entitled to great weight on appeal unless clearly unsupported by the record (see Matter of Bongiorno v Bongiorno, 1 AD3d 511). Here, the Family Court properly dismissed the petition upon finding that the petitioner failed to establish by a preponderance of the evidence that the respondent committed such acts upon determining that the respondent's use of physical force against the petitioner was justified ( see Penal Law § 35.15). We find no basis to disturb that determination.


Summaries of

Washington v. Washington

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Sep 19, 2006
32 A.D.3d 964 (N.Y. App. Div. 2006)
Case details for

Washington v. Washington

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of DENEENE WASHINGTON, Appellant, v. Vic WASHINGTON…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Sep 19, 2006

Citations

32 A.D.3d 964 (N.Y. App. Div. 2006)
2006 N.Y. Slip Op. 6592
820 N.Y.S.2d 812

Citing Cases

Goldring v. Sprei

The Family Court properly dismissed the petition asserted against Joseph Sprei upon finding that the…