From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Washington v. U.S.

United States District Court, S.D. Ohio, Eastern Division
May 15, 2006
Case No. 2:05-cv-160, Crim. No. 2:97-cr-99 (S.D. Ohio May. 15, 2006)

Opinion

Case No. 2:05-cv-160, Crim. No. 2:97-cr-99.

May 15, 2006


OPINION AND ORDER


On April 18, 2006, the Magistrate Judge issued a Report and Recommendation recommending that the instant motion to vacate, set aside, or correct sentence pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255 be dismissed. Petitioner has filed objections to the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation. Petitioner objects solely to the Magistrate Judge's recommendation that claim one be dismissed.

Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1), this Court has conducted a de novo review of those portions of the Report and Recommendation objected to by petitioner. For the reasons discussed in the Report and Recommendation petitioner's objections are OVERRULED.

The Report and Recommendation is ADOPTED and AFFIRMED. This action is hereby DISMISSED.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Washington v. U.S.

United States District Court, S.D. Ohio, Eastern Division
May 15, 2006
Case No. 2:05-cv-160, Crim. No. 2:97-cr-99 (S.D. Ohio May. 15, 2006)
Case details for

Washington v. U.S.

Case Details

Full title:STEPHEN WASHINGTON, Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Respondent

Court:United States District Court, S.D. Ohio, Eastern Division

Date published: May 15, 2006

Citations

Case No. 2:05-cv-160, Crim. No. 2:97-cr-99 (S.D. Ohio May. 15, 2006)

Citing Cases

Young v. U.S.

"[A] petitioner does not satisfy the Rule 15 `relation back' standard merely by raising some type of…