From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Washington v. T-Mobile

United States District Court, District of Nevada
Aug 9, 2022
2:22-cv-01233-BNW (D. Nev. Aug. 9, 2022)

Opinion

2:22-cv-01233-BNW

08-09-2022

Rodney Lashain Washington, Plaintiff, v. T-Mobile, Defendant.


ORDER

Brenda Weksler United States Magistrate Judge.

The United States Postal Service was unable to deliver recent filings in this case. See ECF Nos. 4-5. Thus, it appears that Plaintiff is no longer at the address on file with the Court. Under Local Rule IA 3-1,

An attorney or pro se party must immediately file with the court written notification of any change of mailing address, email address, telephone number, or facsimile number. The notification must include proof of service on each opposing party or the party's attorney. Failure to comply with this rule may result in the dismissal of the action, entry of default judgment, or other sanctions as deemed appropriate by the court.

Plaintiff must file a notice with his current address with the Court by August 30, 2022. Failure to comply with this Order may result in a dismissal of this case.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Washington v. T-Mobile

United States District Court, District of Nevada
Aug 9, 2022
2:22-cv-01233-BNW (D. Nev. Aug. 9, 2022)
Case details for

Washington v. T-Mobile

Case Details

Full title:Rodney Lashain Washington, Plaintiff, v. T-Mobile, Defendant.

Court:United States District Court, District of Nevada

Date published: Aug 9, 2022

Citations

2:22-cv-01233-BNW (D. Nev. Aug. 9, 2022)