From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Washington v. State

Supreme Court of Delaware
Sep 13, 2005
882 A.2d 762 (Del. 2005)

Opinion

No. 242, 2005.

Submitted: July 27, 2005.

Decided: September 13, 2005.

Superior Court of the State of Delaware, in and for New Castle County, Cr. ID 9603000529.

Before HOLLAND, JACOBS and RIDGELY, Justices.


ORDER


This 13th day of September 2005, after careful consideration of the appellant's opening brief, the State's motion to affirm and the record below, we find it manifest that the judgment of the Superior Court should be affirmed on the basis of the Superior Court's well-reasoned decision dated May 17, 2005. The Superior Court did not err in concluding that Washington's claims for postconviction relief were both time-barred and previously adjudicated under Superior Court Criminal Rules 61(i)(1) and 61(i)(4) and that Washington had failed to overcome these procedural hurdles.

NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED that the judgment of the Superior Court is AFFIRMED.


Summaries of

Washington v. State

Supreme Court of Delaware
Sep 13, 2005
882 A.2d 762 (Del. 2005)
Case details for

Washington v. State

Case Details

Full title:KEVIN WASHINGTON, Defendant Below-Appellant, v. STATE OF DELAWARE…

Court:Supreme Court of Delaware

Date published: Sep 13, 2005

Citations

882 A.2d 762 (Del. 2005)

Citing Cases

Washington v. Carroll

The Superior Court denied the motion, Washington appealed, and the Delaware Supreme Court affirmed the…